Proving judicial notoriety
In its decision 7Cdo/123/2023 of February 3, 2025, the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic expressed the opinion that if the court considered a judgment issued by a court in other proceedings to be a fact known to it from its official activities, it was its procedural obligation to inform the parties to the dispute of this and to give them the opportunity to comment if it planned to base its decision on the judgment.
In its decision 7Cdo/123/2023 of February 3, 2025, the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic expressed the opinion that if the court considered a judgment issued by a court in other proceedings to be a fact known to it from its official activities, it was its procedural obligation to inform the parties to the dispute of this and to give them the opportunity to comment if it planned to base its decision on the judgment.